The 2014 ECAC Race in a Nutshell

© 1999-2014, Joe Schlobotnik (archives)

URL for this frameset: http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2014/ecac.nutexpl.shtml

Game results taken from College Hockey News's Division I composite schedule

See also

Magic Numbers and Remaining Schedule

The records listed after the teams are points for (number of ties plus twice the number of wins), points against (ties plus twice losses), and points remaining (twice the number of games remaining). Then the remaining games on each team's schedule. (Home games are printed in CAPS while road games are in lowercase.) Then come the magic numbers for each team to finish ahead of each other team. These are expressed as total number of points gained by one team and/or lost by the other, so if there are n games left in the season, each pair of teams has 4n points towards the magic numbers (2n points of wins for one team and 2n points of losses for the other).

Team PF-PA-PR W-L-T UnCgQnCrCkYaRPSLBnDaHaPn
Team PF-PA-PR W-L-T UnCgQnCrCkYaRPSLBnDaHaPn
Union 37-7-0 18-3-1 00000000000
Colgate 29-15-0 13-6-3 xx0000000000
Quinnipiac 28-16-0 12-6-4 xxxx000000000
Cornell 26-18-0 11-7-4 xxxxxx00000000
Clarkson 24-20-0 11-9-2 xxxxxxxx ½ 000000
Yale 24-20-0 10-8-4 xxxxxxxx ½ 000000
RPI 21-23-0 8-9-5 xxxxxxxxxxxx00000
St. Lawrence 18-26-0 7-11-4 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx0000
Brown 17-27-0 8-13-1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx000
Dartmouth 16-28-0 7-13-2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ½ 0
Harvard 16-28-0 6-12-4 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ½ 0
Princeton 8-36-0 4-18-0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

An entry of xx in a team's row means that that team will definitely finish behind the team whose column it's in.

In addition, information about the ECAC tiebreakers is included. An integer means I've worked out all the tiebreaker possibilities definitively and come up with the magic number of points team one team needs to finish ahead of the other. When the tiebreakers are unresolved, the table still includes head-to-head information.

If the first tiebreaker, head-to-head record between the two teams, is undetermined (i.e., the season series was split or not yet finished), there is a ½ after the number. For instance, if team A's magic number to tie team B is 9 points, and they split the season series, the tie-breaker between the teams will go down to record against the top four, which cannot be determined yet, and team A's magic number to finish ahead of team B is nine and one-half, which means there will be a in the table.

If one team has won the season series with another, we know they would win a two-team tie-breaker in the event of a tie, but might still lose a three-team tie-breaker. For instance, suppose team X swept team Y and has a magic number of 8 to tie them in the standings. Since they would prevail in the tie-breaker unless the two teams end up in a three-way tie, team X's magic number to finish a ahead of team Y is probably 8, maybe 9. Hence 8+ in the table.

Similarly, if team X has a magic number of 8 to tie team Z, but lost the season series, their magic number to top team Z is 9, unless they can m anage a three-way tie, in which case it might be 8. Hence 9- in the table.

The following tables allow calculation of the ECAC tiebreakers:

Head-to-Head Points

First, the points in head-to-head games between pairs of teams. For pairs that have completed their season series, the points are out of a possible 4 (two games). Everyone else is out of a possbible 2, and that is indicated with a * signifying there's still a game left.

Team PF-PA-PR UnCgQnCrCkYaRPSLBnDaHaPnTop 4 Top 8
Team PF-PA-PR UnCgQnCrCkYaRPSLBnDaHaPnTop 4 Top 8
Union 37-7-01 2 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 7-521-7
Colgate 29-15-03 2 3 4 0 1 4 2 4 2 4 8-417-11
Quinnipiac 28-16-02 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 4 3 2 6-617-11
Cornell 26-18-00 1 2 2 4 1 3 4 1 4 4 3-913-15
Clarkson 24-20-00 0 1 2 2 3 4 4 2 2 4 3-1312-16
Yale 24-20-00 4 1 0 2 4 3 2 1 3 4 5-1114-14
RPI 21-23-00 3 1 3 1 0 2 4 4 1 2 7-910-18
St. Lawrence 18-26-02 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 3 4 5-118-20
Brown 17-27-00 2 2 0 0 2 0 3 2 4 2 4-129-23
Dartmouth 16-28-00 0 0 3 2 3 0 2 2 2 2 3-1310-22
Harvard 16-28-00 2 1 0 2 1 3 1 0 2 4 3-1310-22
Princeton 8-36-00 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2-144-28

Head-to-Head Goal Differentials

If two more more teams are tied overall record and head-to-head points and have the same records vs the top 5 and top 10 teams, net goals (head-to-head, vs the top 5 and vs the top 10) must be used as a tiebreaker. Top 5 and top 10 goal differentials are listed in this table as total goal differentials in the appropriate number of games.

Team GF-GA UnCgQnCrCkYaRPSLBnDaHaPnTop 4 Top 8
Team GF-GA UnCgQnCrCkYaRPSLBnDaHaPnTop 4 Top 8
Union 83-42-2 +1 +6 +6 +4 +4 +3 +4 +6 +3 +6 +5/6gms+22/14gms
Colgate 72-59+2 -3 +5 +2 -6 -4 +6 -1 +4 +1 +7 +4/6gms+2/14gms
Quinnipiac 78-43-1 +3 +2 +3 +4 +4 +7 +1 +9 +1 +2 +4/6gms+22/14gms
Cornell 51-50-6 -5 -2 0 +2 -2 +3 +5 -1 +2 +5 -13/6gms-10/14gms
Clarkson 57-64-6 -2 -3 0 -2 +3 +2 +2 -4 0 +3 -11/8gms-8/14gms
Yale 71-56-4 +6 -4 -2 +2 +6 +2 +4 -3 +3 +5 -4/8gms+6/14gms
RPI 57-57-4 +4 -4 +2 -3 -6 -3 +6 +8 -2 +2 -2/8gms-14/14gms
St. Lawrence 70-78-3 -6 -7 -3 -2 -2 +3 -2 +1 +2 +11 -19/8gms-20/14gms
Brown 48-62-4 +1 -1 -5 -2 -4 -6 +2 0 +3 +2 -9/8gms-19/16gms
Dartmouth 51-72-6 -4 -9 +1 +4 +3 -8 -1 0 -2 +1 -18/8gms-20/16gms
Harvard 44-52-3 -1 -1 -2 0 -3 +2 -2 -3 +2 +3 -7/8gms-10/16gms
Princeton 44-91-6 -7 -2 -5 -3 -5 -2 -11 -2 -1 -3 -20/8gms-41/16gms

Last Modified: 2020 February 1

Joe Schlobotnik / joe@amurgsval.org

HTML 4.0 compliant CSS2 compliant