Ranking Systems for D1 College Hockey (2012-2013)

© 1999-2012, Joe Schlobotnik (archives)

URL for this frameset: http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2013/rankings.shtml

Game results taken from College Hockey News's Division I composite schedule

Comparison Between Rankings

The following table lists the 58 teams eligible for the NCAA Division I Men's Ice Hockey Tournament.

Team Record RPI KRACH PWR
Rk W-L-T Pct. Rk Rating Rk Rating RRWP Rk Rating
Quinnipiac 1 30-8-5 .7558 1 .5755 1 383.1 .7786 1 30
Minnesota 2 26-9-5 .7125 2 .5569 2 295.4 .7326 3 27
Mass-Lowell 3 28-11-2 .7073 3 .5564 3 288.7 .7283 2 28
Niagara 4 23-10-5 .6711 14 .5290 24 119.0 .5397 13 17
Miami 5 25-12-5 .6548 5 .5444 5 216.3 .6711 4 26
Notre Dame 6 25-13-3 .6463 6 .5442 6 215.2 .6701 9 21
Yale 7 22-12-3 .6351 4 .5489 4 255.9 .7050 5 25
Boston Coll 8 22-12-4 .6316 7 .5366 7 209.8 .6647 8 23
MSU-Mankato 9 24-14-3 .6220 12 .5335 9 203.7 .6586 15 16
Union 10 22-13-5 .6125 8 .5355 13 193.1 .6472 6 24
North Dakota 11T 22-13-7 .6071 9 .5348 10 201.8 .6566 10 21
St Cloud 11T 25-16-1 .6071 10 .5338 11 200.0 .6547 11 21
Wisconsin 11T 22-13-7 .6071 16 .5281 14 186.7 .6401 17 14
Western Mich 14 19-11-8 .6053 15 .5287 16 164.4 .6124 16 15
New Hampshire 15 20-12-7 .6026 11 .5335 8 204.0 .6589 7 24
Holy Cross 16 20-14-3 .5811 30 .5012 42 76.62 .4397 30 1
Robert Morris 17 20-14-4 .5789 26 .5045 39 81.93 .4547 14 16
Denver U 18 20-14-5 .5769 13 .5313 12 195.9 .6503 12 17
Connecticut 19 19-14-4 .5676 32 .4983 44 73.66 .4308
Boston Univ 20 21-16-2 .5641 18 .5210 15 165.2 .6134 20 12
Air Force 21T 17-13-7 .5541 33 .4971 46 71.52 .4243
RPI 21T 18-14-5 .5541 17 .5231 17 162.9 .6103 18 14
Providence 23 17-14-7 .5395 19 .5191 18 162.5 .6098 22 10
Brown 24 16-14-6 .5278 20 .5165 20 139.3 .5755 21 11
St Lawrence 25 18-16-4 .5263 24 .5088 23 121.8 .5451 26 6
Mercyhurst 26 19-17-5 .5244 35 .4914 48 65.25 .4041
Dartmouth 27 15-14-5 .5147 21 .5129 21 134.7 .5679 23 10
AK-Fairbanks 28 17-16-4 .5135 27 .5044 28 111.8 .5255 19 12
NE-Omaha 29 19-18-2 .5128 31 .5005 25 116.3 .5346 31 0
Canisius 30T 19-19-5 .5000 38 .4877 49 63.19 .3971
Ferris State 30T 16-16-5 .5000 25 .5052 27 112.8 .5275 27 3
CO College 32 18-19-5 .4881 22 .5111 19 139.8 .5763 25 7
Michigan 33T 18-19-3 .4875 29 .5024 29 109.2 .5200 29 3
Ohio State 33T 16-17-7 .4875 28 .5027 26 115.4 .5328 28 3
Cornell 35 15-16-3 .4853 23 .5104 22 133.0 .5650 24 8
Penn State 36 11-12 .4783 45 .4782 50 55.12 .3679
Merrimack 37 15-17-6 .4737 34 .4946 30 104.5 .5101
RIT 38 15-18-5 .4605 48 .4743 51 51.02 .3518
Lake Superior 39 17-21-1 .4487 40 .4847 35 83.27 .4584
Northern Mich 40 15-19-4 .4474 36 .4905 31 99.50 .4989
Colgate 41 14-18-4 .4444 37 .4894 32 91.50 .4797
Minn-Duluth 42 14-19-5 .4342 42 .4807 37 82.23 .4555
American Intl 43 12-17-6 .4286 52 .4589 55 36.02 .2837
Bowling Green 44 15-21-5 .4268 39 .4875 33 88.82 .4730
Michigan Tech 45 13-20-4 .4054 47 .4753 41 80.04 .4494
Princeton 46 10-16-5 .4032 41 .4814 40 80.15 .4497
Mass-Amherst 47 12-19-3 .3971 43 .4791 36 82.94 .4575
Maine 48 11-19-8 .3947 44 .4783 38 81.93 .4547
Vermont 49 11-19-6 .3889 46 .4773 34 85.04 .4631
Bentley 50 12-20-3 .3857 54 .4478 56 29.89 .2507
Mich State 51 14-25-3 .3690 49 .4742 43 73.75 .4311
Harvard 52 10-19-3 .3594 50 .4728 45 72.96 .4287
Clarkson 53 9-20-7 .3472 51 .4726 47 66.68 .4088
Northeastern 54 9-21-4 .3235 53 .4535 52 50.87 .3512
Army 55 7-22-5 .2794 57 .4227 57 19.12 .1822
Bemidji State 56 6-22-8 .2778 55 .4446 53 47.66 .3379
AK-Anchorage 57 4-25-7 .2083 56 .4341 54 36.19 .2846
Sacred Heart 58 2-30-4 .1111 58 .3823 58 6.783 .0774
AL-Huntsville 59 1-20-1 .0682 59 .3764 59 6.169 .0709
Record
A team's winning percentage (Pct) is calculating by adding its wins to half its ties and dividing by the total number of games played. I.e., a tie counts as a half a win and half a loss, which is true for all the rating systems considered here.
RPI
The Ratings Percentage Index, a linear combination of a team's winning percentage (25%) with the winning percentages of their opponents (21%) and their opponents' opponents (54%), which is the most important of the NCAA's selection criteria. More information can be found on our RPI page. Note the value in our table includes the "bad wins" fudge but not the secret "quality wins" bonus. To calculate the ratings using a chosen value of the bonus, go to our Do-it-yourself ratings calculator.
KRACH
Ken's Rating for American College Hockey is an application of the Bradley-Terry method to college hockey; a team's rating is meant to indicate its relative strength on a multiplicative scale, so that the ratio of two teams' ratings gives the odds of each of them winning a game between them. The ratings are chosen so that the expected winning percentage for each team based on its schedule is equal to its actual winning percentage. The Round-Robin Winning Percentage (RRWP) is the winning percentage a team would be expected to accumulate if they played each other team an equal number of times. More information can be found on our KRACH page.
PWR
The PairWise Rating is determined by performing PairWise Comparisons (PWC) according to the NCAA's selection criteria between all teams with RPI's at or above .500 and totalling the number of comparisons each team wins. More information, including a breakdown of comparisons won and lost according to criteria, can be found on our PWC/PWR page.

See also

Last Modified: 2020 February 1

Joe Schlobotnik / joe@amurgsval.org

HTML 4.0 compliant CSS2 compliant